Which of the following should be avoided in communications about the urban forest?

Using battle metaphors in communications about the urban forest can create an adversarial tone that is counterproductive to fostering collaboration and understanding. Such metaphors can imply conflict or aggression, suggesting that trees or nature itself are opponents to be fought against, rather than valued components of the urban environment. This approach risks alienating those who may otherwise support urban forestry initiatives.

In contrast, using technical jargon may complicate understanding for the general public, but it can be appropriate in specific professional discussions. Data-driven statistics can be essential in substantiating claims and garnering support for urban forestry projects. Formal language has its place in certain contexts, but it can also be adapted to be more accessible based on the audience's needs. The key with communications is to promote positive engagement and understanding, which battle metaphors typically undermine.